One year ago the Kansas City Star had a story they could have investigated that would have saved Kansas the embarrassment it went through last week. Only their own bias and inability to see past that bias prevented them from doing their jobs.
One year ago, Phill Kline ran ads that attacked the moral and ethical standards of Paul Morrison. Kline, with the help of a previous Morrison victim, told Kansas voters about Morrison’s past history of sexual harassment and of his bargaining with a victim to make it all go away. Did the Star send reporters to investigate this claim? Did they investigate if Morrison had continued this pattern? Did they ask women at the Johnson County courthouse if they had similar experiences with Morrison? Did they follow him, like KCTV5 followed Phill Kline, to see if he was the moral and ethical man he claimed to be?
Obviously they did none of the above, or they may have broken this story a year ago. At the time, Morrison denied he was a womanizer, and the Star took him at his word. Not only did they defend him, they attacked Kline for having the audacity to question Morrison’s character. Mike Hendricks, in an October 27, 2006 column headlined “Ads shred candidate’s credibility,” implied that it was Kline, not Morrison, who had a poor character. Hendricks said, “I still don't know why it matters what did or didn't happen between Morrison and a female employee…” Well, Mike, maybe now you know why it matters. Barbara Shelly, in an October 25th column headlined “Kline’s desperate campaign tactic,” also says it is Kline that “lacks character and judgment.” Do you see, now, Barbara, why Kline's claims were a pattern worth investigating?
This all begs the question, if the Star had investigated the story, would they have written it given the political consequences. The Star wanted Kline out of office so badly; would they have ignored even solid evidence handed to them? Remember that Morrison was deep into an affair at the time. Would the Star have felt that was a worthy story? Would evidence of that affair made a difference in the election?
It is sad that we even have to question the integrity of our only significant newspaper. But time and again the Star has disappointed us with their lack of objective reporting. The Source doubts this will change any time soon.