« November 2007 | Main | January 2008 »
Internet games involving political figures seem to be all the rage. Here are some of our favorites:
http://foolishpleasurestudio.com/eyewool/slap_hillary.html
http://www.groovyjava.com/games/dancing-hillary/dancing-hillary.php
http://www.miniclip.com/games/presidential-paintball/en/
http://www.justdressupgames.com/games/dress_up_barack_obama/
Kay Barnes spent part of last week revisiting her role as mayor, something she does more often than is typical. Barnes visited the Power and Light District to attend a marker dedication mid-week. On Saturday she was at the Sprint Center to cheer on her KU Jayhawks, and beforehand listened to Terry Riley laud her as her name was added to the plaza in front of the arena.
On both occasions Barnes took the opportunity to single out City Manager Wayne Cauthen for his role in developing downtown. Barnes’s praise was another in a long line of slaps at Mayor Mark Funkhouser by Barnes and her political henchmen. Much like Bill Clinton’s constant criticism of his successor, Barnes’ digs at Funkhouser are out of line.
What makes it worse is that her whining just seems like sour grapes. Barnes tried her best to keep Funkhouser from winning. She called press conferences and called community leaders to secret meetings. She angrily defended her record on TIFs against an audit launched by Funkhouser and completed by his replacement. She did everything possible to get her choice for mayor elected. But she lost. And she lost in her own backyard.
As we approach the holidays it is worth a look at the current Iowa polls for the race for presidential nominations. One reason to look now is that the holidays will likely “freeze” the campaigns pretty much where they are. It may not be until January 2nd, with less than 48 hours left, that the campaigns will have full impact again. Barring major news, The Source would expect recent Iowa polls to be close to the final result.
On the Republican side, Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney continue to separate themselves from the pack. Third place in most recent polls is a close race between Giuliani and Thompson, but they are at least ten points back from second. Despite the endorsement of the Des Moines paper, John McCain is battling for last with Ron Paul.
What is telling here is that Huckabee continues to perform well despite repeated attacks from both Romney and Thompson. Romney keeps talking about Huckabee as if he expects him to drop back off the radar, but Huckabee has been leading in Iowa now for over two weeks, and is building that lead in many polls. In fact, RealClearPolitics.com shows Huckabee’s average lead to be over 10%.
On the Iowa Democratic side, Barak Obama is making a run, passing Hillary Clinton in several polls in the last week. John Edwards, who had a brief stint in first place last spring, is in third, unlikely to rise or fall. For months some political insiders have expressed that Clinton’s support was soft, and that may be starting to show. Obama may also benefit from the Democrat caucus format, as he is more likely than Clinton to pick up the caucus-goers who supported candidates who got less than 15%.
If Huckabee and Obama win Iowa as they are poised to do, what comes next could be interesting. Both show strength in several states that follow. As the lower tier of candidates drop out, where their supporters go may well tell the big picture. The Source can see a scenario where Obama gains most of the support from lower tier “anti-Clinton” voters. We can also see a pattern where Huckabee picks up the bulk of Thompson, Hunter and Tancredo supporters. This puts each in position to challenge on Super Tuesday.
For government run Healthcare 
A new Rasmussen poll was released today which shows Mike Huckabee as the clear front runner in Missouri. Huckabee wins direct match-ups in the state against both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. He also performs better against the Democrats than Rudy Giuliani.
When looking at the polls favorable/unfavorable ratings, Huckabee has a favorable rating of 53%, higher than either Clinton, Obama or Giuliani and a much lower unfavorable than any other candidate polled. When asked which Republican is most in line with Missouri “attitudes and needs,” Huckabee finishes on top followed by Giuliani and John McCain with Fred Thompson and Mitt Romney further behind.
The poll asks several interesting issues questions as well. Missourians overwhelmingly (92%) want English as the nation’s official language. 82% even say employers should be able to require English be spoken on the job.
One year ago the Kansas City Star had a story they could have investigated that would have saved Kansas the embarrassment it went through last week. Only their own bias and inability to see past that bias prevented them from doing their jobs.
One year ago, Phill Kline ran ads that attacked the moral and ethical standards of Paul Morrison. Kline, with the help of a previous Morrison victim, told Kansas voters about Morrison’s past history of sexual harassment and of his bargaining with a victim to make it all go away. Did the Star send reporters to investigate this claim? Did they investigate if Morrison had continued this pattern? Did they ask women at the Johnson County courthouse if they had similar experiences with Morrison? Did they follow him, like KCTV5 followed Phill Kline, to see if he was the moral and ethical man he claimed to be?
Obviously they did none of the above, or they may have broken this story a year ago. At the time, Morrison denied he was a womanizer, and the Star took him at his word. Not only did they defend him, they attacked Kline for having the audacity to question Morrison’s character. Mike Hendricks, in an October 27, 2006 column headlined “Ads shred candidate’s credibility,” implied that it was Kline, not Morrison, who had a poor character. Hendricks said, “I still don't know why it matters what did or didn't happen between Morrison and a female employee…” Well, Mike, maybe now you know why it matters. Barbara Shelly, in an October 25th column headlined “Kline’s desperate campaign tactic,” also says it is Kline that “lacks character and judgment.” Do you see, now, Barbara, why Kline's claims were a pattern worth investigating?
This all begs the question, if the Star had investigated the story, would they have written it given the political consequences. The Star wanted Kline out of office so badly; would they have ignored even solid evidence handed to them? Remember that Morrison was deep into an affair at the time. Would the Star have felt that was a worthy story? Would evidence of that affair made a difference in the election?
It is sad that we even have to question the integrity of our only significant newspaper. But time and again the Star has disappointed us with their lack of objective reporting. The Source doubts this will change any time soon.
The Columbia Daily Tribune Politics Blog is reporting that Democrat State Senator Chuck Graham has pled guilty to to a DWI.
Paul Morrison has scheduled a press conference for this afternoon at 3:00.
The Source has heard that Morrison will resign and that a successor is ready to be named.
Kansas City Congressman Emmanuel Cleaver was one of only 49 members to vote against the 2008 Defense Authorization. In voting against the bill sponsored by fellow Missouri Democrat Ike Skelton, Cleaver voted against pay raises for our troops, personnel increases for several branches, and equipment to protect the men and women who protect us.
In addition, Cleaver voted against $980 million for National Guard equipment. That vote is ironic since Democrats keep saying how much they care about the National Guard being well stocked with equipment and personnel.
Cleaver also voted against provisions which assure wounded warriors of receiving the health care they have earned through DoD and VA health care programs.
This isn’t the first time that Cleaver has voted out of step with the vast majority of Congress. It isn’t the first time he has failed to support our troops. Given that no other Missouri representative voted with him, it is unlikely his vote even represents his constituents.
The Source has learned that a Kansas City Star reporter may have been offered insider access to the details of the Paul Morrison story weeks ago and declined to investigate.
The reporter, rumored to be Star legal reporter Dan Margolies, reportedly met with someone who had access to the EEOC complaint filed early in November. The meeting took place only weeks after the filing. According to the rumors, the reporter saw the EEOC complaint and had a chance to ask questions, but passed on the story because he thought it was politically motivated.
Political veterans in Johnson County have been wondering out loud how it took the Topeka Capital-Journal to break a story that happened in the Star’s backyard. Speculation about the Star’s unwillingness to investigate Morrison (and willingness to vilify Phill Kline) started from the moment the story broke.
If the Star squashed this story, they should be ashamed. It is probably the biggest political story of the year in Kansas, and maybe the region.
Phill Kline was right all along.
It was Kline who first alluded to the fact that Paul Morrison may have a problem dating women not his wife. Kline was roundly ignored by a mainstream media who had chosen their winner long before, and were not about to investigate anything that may have taken the wind from his sails.
Yesterday’s Topeka Capital-Journal finally uncovers the details of a Morrison affair and his mistress’s claims of harassment, discrimination and intimidation. At the forefront are claims by the woman that Morrison “pressured her to make use of her position in the D.A.'s office to influence pending litigation.” In addition, Morrison “attempted to glean from her sensitive information about Kline's activities as district attorney.”
The story goes on to detail the affair itself and the way Morrison manipulated the woman, approaching her several times despite her initial attempts to resist. It details conversations they had about cases, included the Tiller abortion prosecutions. It goes into specifics from the mistress’s complaint about what Morrison asked her to do.
What is particularly amazing is that Phill Kline could have outed Morrison months ago, but didn’t. The article details a brief filed by Kline that asks for a witness to be protected from being intimidated. The judge denied the brief because Kline asked for it to be under seal, or private, to protect someone from “grave harm.” When given the opportunity to file the brief publicly, and expose Morrison, Kline declined.
The Source calls on the court to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate these charges. Not because Morrison had an affair, but because he used that affair to interfere with and possible influence a witness in a federal employment lawsuit. He also used his mistress to spy on his political rival, a fellow prosecutor, for his political gain. For the state’s top law enforcement official that is unacceptable and could be grounds for impeachment.
In a rare piece of footage from the Clinton era, the World Federalist Association gives ex-broadcaster and St. Joseph native Walter Cronkite its Global Governance award. In accepting the award, Cronkite said, “Today we must develop federal structures on a global level. To deal with world problems we need a system of enforceable world law, a democratic federal world government.”
Astonishingly, one of the first people to congratulate Cronkite on his award and his philosophy that night was Hillary Clinton. In a satellite hookup she told him, “For decades you told us ‘the way it is’, but tonight we honor you for fighting for the way it could be.”
Cronkite has long been linked with the concept of a world government. That Clinton seems to be on the same page is news to The Source. We hope Clinton will be immediately called on to clarify her stance, since anyone wanting to be President of the United States of America should recognize our government, and no government above it.
The Source is also curious where Cronkite's cousin Kay Barnes stands on this important issue. Does she agree with her cousin on the concept of global government? Does she agree with likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton? As a congressperson would she be loyal to the United States government or to some higher world authority?
